Models explaining variation in chemical defence between plants

Authors & references

Authors:

Seppo Kellomäki, Pekka Niemelä, Heli Peltola, Veikko Koski and Pertti Pulkkinen

References:

1. Bryant, J. P., Tuomi, J., and Niemelä, P. 1988. In: K.S. Spencer (ed.) Chemical Mediation of Coevolution, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 367–389.
2. Herms, D.A., and Mattson W.J. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. The Quarterly Review of Biology 67 (3): 283–335.
3. Tahvanainen, J., Julkunen-Tiitto, R., Rousi, M., and Reichardt, P. 1991. Chemoecology. 2(1): 49–54.
4. Mattson, W., Niemelä, P., and Rousi, M. (eds.). 1996. Dynamics of Forest Herbivory: Guest for Pattern and Principle (W. J. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report NC-183, St Paul.
5. Shigesada, N., and Kawasaki, K. 1997. Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 205 p.
6. Koricheva, J., Larsson, S., and Haukioja, E. 1998. Insect performance on experimentally stressed woody plants: a meta-analysis. Annual Review of Entomology 43: 195–216.
7. Bezemer, T. M., and Jones, T. H., 1998. Plant-insect herbivore interactions in elevated atmospheric CO2: quantitative analyses and guild effects. Oikos 82: 212-222.
8. Mattson, W., Kuokkanen, K., Niemelä, P., Julkunen-Tiitto, R., Kellomäki, S., and Tahvanainen, J. 2004. Elevated CO2 alters birch resistance to Lagomorpha herbivores. Global Change Biology 10: 1402-1413.