Control requirements in wood handling

Authors & references

Authors:

Ari Isokangas, University of Oulu

References:

1. Niiranen M. 1985. Study of debarking drum process dimensioning. Doctoral Thesis. Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, 139 p.
2. Koskinen, K. 1999. Wood handling applications. In Gullichsen J & Fogelholm C-J (eds.) Papermaking Science and Technology, Book 6A. Chemical pulping. Helsinki, Fapet Oy:331–491.
3. Agin, S-A. and Svensson, Å. 1990. Fibre losses – economic consequences for the wood yard processes. Proc. 24th Eucepa Conference, Stockholm:47–55.
4. Niinimäki, J. and Stoor, T. 2003. New approach to the control of wood tumble debarking. Proc. 22nd IASTED International Conference; Modelling, Identification and Control, Innsbruck, Austria.
5. Pihtsalmi, L. 2005. Puun ominaisuuksien ja kapasiteetin vaikutus hakkeen laatuun, diplomityö, Oulun yliopisto, Oulu, 76 s. (In Finnish)
6. Hartler, N. 1986. Chipper design and operation for optimum chip quality. Tappi Journal 69(10):62–66.
7. Niiranen, M. 1983. Kuitupuun tehdaskäsittely. In: Virkola N. E. (toim.) Suomen paperi-insinöörien yhdistys r.y. Puumassan valmistus, 1. osa , 2. painos, Turku, Oy Turun Sanomat:125–258. (In Finnish)
8. Hartler, N. 1996. Achievement and significance of optimal chip quality. Tappi Journal 79(2):259–264.
9. Öman, M. and Söderstam, G. 2001. Comparison of stored and green wood raw materials. Paperi ja puu 83(1):50–57.
10. Belli, M. 1996. Wet storage of hickory pulpwood in the Southern United States and its impact on bark removal efficiency. Forest Products Journal 46(3):75–79.
11. Liukko, K. and Elowsson, T. 1999. The effect of bark condition, delivery time and climate-adapted wet storage on the moisture content of Picea abies (L.) Karst. pulpwood. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 14(2):156–163.