Fixation and other sticky control options

Authors & references

Authors:

Roland Pelzer, James G. Tausche, Dr Jianhu Ma; Manuel Fuzy, Joerg Polste

Based on: Papermaking Science and Technology, book 7, Recycled fibre and deinking, Höke U. and Schabel S. (Book editor). Chapter 7 Additives. Jyväskylä, 2000, Fapet Oy. More references can also be found in this chapter.

References:

1. Esser, A., Blum, R., Kuhn, J. and Leduc, M. 2004. New Developments in the field of trash reduction with polyvinylamides. In: Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation No. 10 .
2. Baumann, P., Esser, A., Rübenacker, M. and Kuhn, J. 2002. Optimized use of fixatives for production increase. In: PTS Symposium Chemical Technology in Paper Making, Munich.
3. Wortley, B.H. 1987. The role of alum in acid, neutral and alkaline papermaking. In: TAPPI Advanced Topics Wet End Chemistry Seminar Notes, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, p. 55.
4. Laufmann, M. and Hummel, W. 1991. Neutral wood containing paper production. In: Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation 119(8):269.
5. Neimo, L. 1993. Coagulation of anionic fines and colloids originating in LWC broke. In: Nordic Pulp Paper Res., J. 8 (1):170.
6. Rebarber, E.S. 1995. How to avoid white pitch and its many pitfalls In: TAPPI Journal 78(5):252.
7. Faber, W. 2007. Aluminiumnitratsulfate — Experience with an innovative Additive for stickies and trash elimination. In: PTS Stickies-Seminar, Conference Book, Dresden.
8. Kröhl, T., Lorencak, A., Gierulki, H. Eipel, H. and Horn, D., 1994. A new laser- optical method for counting colloidally dispersed pitch. In: Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J., 9(2):125.
9. Hentzschel, P. 1991. Lab study about simulation and oppression of polymer aggregates (white pitch) when using coated broke. In: Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation, 119 (15):569.
10. Von Seyerl, J. and Beck, F. 1993. Reuse of coating colours and coated broke – Observation concerning trash abolition In: Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation, 121 (9):344.
11. Allen, L.H. and Filion, D. 1995. A laboratory white pitch deposition test for screening additives. In: TAPPI Papermakers Conference, Chicago, p. 539.
12. Mönch, D., Stange, A., Linhart, F. 1996. Advanced product concepts for trash removal and efficiency increase in paper production. In: Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation, 124 (20):889.
13. Gercke, M., Kannegießer, D., Scholz, R. and Arnold, J. 1997. Optimal application of process chemicals — new possibilities for process optimisation. In: Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation 125(9):452.
14. Gill, R.I.S. 1996. Chemical control of deposits — scopes and limitations. In: Paper Technology, 37(6):23.
15. McKinney, R.W.J. and Currie, P.C.G.1986. Sticky pacification — new additive shows considerable promise. In: TAPPI Papermakers Conference Proceedings, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, p.161.
16. Wade, D.E. 1990. Sticky pacification with synthetic pulps. In: Recycling Paper: From Fibre to Finished Product (M.J. Coleman, Ed), Vol. 2, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, p.536.
17. Hamann, A. 2003. Research of depositing behaviour of tacky contaminants during paper production from recovered paper. In: Dissertation, TU Darmstadt, Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry.
18. Sykes, M., Klungness, J., Gleisner, R., and Abubakr, S. 1998. Stickie removal using neutral enzymatic repulping and pressure screening. TAPPI Proceedings Recycling Symposium, New Or-leans, LA. TAPPI, Atlanta, GA.
19. Seifert, P. 2005. Enzymes — A new effective solution of advanced stickies elimination. In: PTS Stickies Seminar, Dresden.
20. Hoekstra, P.M. and May, O.W. 1987. Developments in the control of stickies. In: TAPPI Pulping Conference Proceedings, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, p. 573.
21. Elsby, L.E. 1986. Experiences from Tissue and Board production using stickies additives. In: TAPPI 1986 Pulping Conference Proceedings, TAPPI Press, Atlanta, p. 445