Previous Next
Author:
Erland Hermansson, Taitotalo Oy
Based on:
ForestBioFacts. Energy and Biofuels, Esa Vakkilainen (editor-in-chief)
References:
1. Siitonen, S. et al. (2002). Possibilities of Reducing CO2 Emissions in the Finnish Forest Industry. Helsinki
2. Esa Vakkilainen and Satu Kähkönen (authors in original article: Energy and biofuels – ForestBioFacts)
3. Tikka, M. (2008). UPM Kymi new recovery line (in Finnish). Soodakattilapäivät 29 October 2008.
4. Vakkilainen, E. et al. (2013). Large Industrial Users of Energy Biomass. IEA Bioenergy Task 40.
5. FAO. (2019). Food and agriculture data. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en
6. Huhtinen, M. et al. (1999). Combustion of bark. Chemical Pulping, Part 2 : Recovery of Chemicals and Energy, Jyväskylä, Fapet Oy. ISBN 9789525216264
7. Hamaguchi, M. et al. (2012). Alternative technologies for biofuel production in kraft pulp mills – potential and prospects. Energies, 5(7) 2288–2309.
8. Alén, R. (ed.). (2010). Biorefining of Forest Resources, Jyväskylä, Fapet Oy, ISBN 9789525216394.
9. Kuparinen, K. et al. (2019). Biomass-based carbon capture and utilization in kraft pulp mills. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 24, 1–18.
10. Demirbaş, A. (2001). Pyrolysis and steam gasification processes of black liquor. Energy Conversion and Management, 43(7) 877–884.
11. Consonni, S. et al. (2003). Integration issues, performances estimates and environmental benefits of black liquor gasification combined cycles for the pulp & paper industry. Colloquium of black liquor combustion and gasification, Park City, Utah, 13–16 May.
12. Raymond, D. (2003). The compelling case for gasification technology in the forest products industry. Proceedings of Colloquium of black liquor combustion and gasification, Park City, Utah, 13–16 May.